Analisis Faktor Pendorong dan Penarik pada Pengembangan Minat Usaha: Kajian Sistematis dalam Model Jodyanne Kirkwood

Authors

  • Aini Ashary
  • Muh. Husriadi
  • La Ode Muhammad Juanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59689/commo.v7i1.1467

Keywords:

faktor pendorong, faktor penarik, minat berwirausaha

Abstract

Push and pull factors have long served as two explanatory poles in entrepreneurial motivation research. Jodyanne Kirkwood's (2009) model proposes an integrative approach that transcends this conventional dichotomy by demonstrating that both factors operate simultaneously within entrepreneurs. This systematic review aims to map how push and pull factors are operationalized in the literature, to identify the factor configurations most consistently associated with entrepreneurial interest development, and to evaluate the relevance of Kirkwood's model against recent empirical findings. Following the PRISMA protocol, 186 articles were identified from Google Scholar, Scopus (open access filter), and DOAJ; after staged screening, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed thematically. Findings indicate that pull factors, particularly the desire for independence, opportunity recognition, and achievement aspiration, predominate across research contexts, while push factors function more as enabling contexts than sole causal drivers. The push-pull interaction proves more nuanced than previously assumed; this review affirms the relevance of Kirkwood's model while identifying contextual dimensions that warrant expansion, especially in developing-country applications such as Indonesia.

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453. doi:10.5465/AMR.1988.4306970

Dawson, C., & Henley, A. (2012). 'Push' versus 'pull' entrepreneurship: An ambiguous distinction? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(6), 697–719. doi:10.1108/13552551211268139

Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105–130. doi:10.1111/etap.12171

Kirkwood, J. (2009). Motivational factors in a push-pull theory of entrepreneurship. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 346–364. doi:10.1108/17542410910968347

Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47–57. doi:10.1177/104225879602100103

Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0

Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063

Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x

Orhan, M., & Scott, D. (2001). Why women enter into entrepreneurship: An exploratory model. Women in Management Review, 16(5), 232–247. doi:10.1108/09649420110395719

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Schjoedt, L., & Shaver, K. G. (2007). Deciding on an entrepreneurial career: A test of the pull and push hypotheses using the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics data. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 733–752. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00197.x

Segal, G., Borgia, D., & Schoenfeld, J. (2005). The motivation to become an entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(1), 42–57. doi:10.1108/13552550510580834

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.2791611

Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Prentice-Hall.

Suharti, L., & Sirine, H. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap niat kewirausahaan (entrepreneurial intention): Studi terhadap mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 13(2), 124–134. doi:10.9744/jmk.13.2.124-134

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Wijaya, T. (2008). Kajian model empiris perilaku berwirausaha UKM DIY dan Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 10(2), 93–104. doi:10.9744/jmk.10.2.93-104

Williams, C. C. (2009). The motives of off-the-books entrepreneurs: Necessity- or opportunity-driven? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(2), 203–217. doi:10.1007/s11365-009-0106-1

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles